Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
A man scremas while waving the flag of Brazil during an ESL Counter-Strike tournament.
Photo via ESL

Brazil tax change could have big implications on esports betting

This may also affect the esports industry as a whole.

A sudden increase in Brazil’s gross gaming revenue tax prompts backlash from operators and raises concerns about the future of esports betting.

The Brazilian government has implemented a sharp increase in taxes on the gambling sector, raising the gross gaming revenue (GGR) tax rate from 12 percent to 18 percent. The change, introduced through a provisional measure in June 2025, represents a 50 percent hike and has drawn strong criticism from both domestic and international betting operators.

This fiscal adjustment comes just six months after Brazil launched its regulated online gambling market in January 2025, an initiative widely seen as a major step forward in legitimizing the industry.

Brazilian gambling industry leaders criticize sudden policy shift

Logo of Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) against a blurred background of an esports player and crowd.
Instituto Brasileiro de Jogo Responsável (IBJR) logo. Images via IBJR and ESL, remixed by Dot Esports

Key industry associations, including the Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) and the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL), have labeled the tax measure “unacceptable.”

“By raising the tax on bets, the illegal market tends to grow from the current 50% to at least 60%, generating an estimated loss of more than R$2bn per year in revenue,” the IBJR, which represents leading licensed operators in the country’s newly regulated gambling market, said in a statement.

The institute emphasized that operators had already paid R$30 million each for a five-year license, collectively contributing over R$2.3 billion in public revenue. Many companies, it noted, had structured their long-term strategies around the original 12 percent GGR tax rate.

Naturally, betting companies have expressed frustration over the timing and manner of the tax hike. They argue that such sudden changes erode legal certainty, discourage long-term planning, and make Brazil a less attractive market for global gaming operators.

Eduardo Ludmer, head of legal at BetMGM Brazil, highlighted the lack of consultation with stakeholders. “They agreed to invest hundreds of millions into this venture and then six months down the road they just change the rules of the game without asking you,” Ludmer said.

Despite the backlash, the Brazilian government has defended the increase, citing a BRL20 billion budget shortfall. Officials claim the higher tax rate is needed to rebalance public finances and ensure the sustainability of newly regulated markets. Still, critics contend that overburdening operators so early in the market’s development risks undermining the very system the government seeks to build.

Esports betting faces collateral damage

VCT Lock In crowd at the venue in Brazil.
Crowd at the VCT LOCK//IN in São Paulo, Brazil. Photo via Riot Games

The esports betting sector, one of the fastest-growing verticals in Brazil’s gambling ecosystem, is particularly vulnerable to this abrupt tax reform. Esports operators are subject to the same GGR tax rate, and the increased financial burden may lead some companies to scale back their offerings, postpone market entry, or withdraw entirely. This could stifle the variety and competitiveness of esports betting options available to consumers.

The tax hike also risks pushing more users toward offshore and unregulated platforms, especially in esports, where younger, tech-savvy audiences are already familiar with international alternatives. Such a shift would weaken efforts to centralize gambling activity within the legal framework.

The potential contraction of the legal esports betting market could have broader implications. Reduced operator presence may lead to fewer sponsorship deals, limited tournament funding, and slower innovation, undermining the momentum of Brazil’s growing esports scene. With esports increasingly intertwined with regulated gambling revenues, the sector’s long-term development may now hinge on how the government and lawmakers address the industry’s concerns.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jeremiah Sevilla
Jeremiah Sevilla
Freelance Evening Editor. Jeremiah is a professional writer since 2017, covering esports and traditional sports. He started following the Dota 2 pro scene in 2014 before getting drawn to other titles. He previously wrote for ONE Esports, Manila Bulletin, The Manila Times, and Mineski.