Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Soldiers walking under a large bridge-like structure with one soldier looking back over their shoulder
Image via Dice/EA

One key feature is returning in Battlefield 6—but fans are split. Here’s why

Sometimes to go forward, you need to look back.

The leaks of the upcoming new Battlefield game’s first playtest as part of Battlefield Labs have been coming fast and hard since last week. But that may be a good thing.

Recommended Videos

There’s been no shortage of clips and footage of gameplay from the playtest, including one that was posted on Reddit and started a discussion about an old staple feature that is one that seems to make Battlefield, and has been missing for too long.

One constant of the footage from the new game, which shows damage numbers when shooting enemies and takes place on a smaller, congested map than what’s recently been offered, has been the destruction of buildings. In the clip in the Reddit thread above, the player in the video is getting absolutely hammered by friendly fire from a tank, and they look up to watch the building they were taking cover near crumble around them.

This sort of building destruction was introduced in the series many years ago, but wasn’t included or as fleshed out in recent titles. But I and many others think it’s beautiful, while others do not share the same opinion, as some think that the “true destruction” is just a farce and it’s only built to look that way.

“Doesn’t even look dynamic at this point in the build,” one unimpressed gamer said. “Looks like the columns can take some damage but when the building ‘HP’ is low enough it plays an animation to change it to a pre-baked ‘destroyed building’ model.”

Whether it’s “dynamic” or “static” doesn’t seem to matter to most, though, and I’m of the same opinion. Whether it’s happening in real time (likely very resource-intensive) or is only meant to look that way, if it looks cool, then who cares?

“I’d rather have the illusion than have nothing,” another fan said. “The levolution system in Battlefield games was one of the coolest things they introduced to the series. It took a back seat for a while, and I’m ready to see more of it come back, even in small examples like this.”

Not to mention the fact that this is way too early to tell anything about the game, which may or may not be called Battlefield 6 or something different entirely. But the leaked clips have the community talking, and that’s probably the point of all of this anyway.

The Battlefield V Cover Art featuring 4 soldiers in bright blue and red colors
Is building destruction important to you? Image via Dice/EA

While some are choosing hope and excitement, many others refuse to feel excitement for the game, especially after Battlefield 2042 disappointed so many. But I think with what’s been seen so far, especially destruction making its return like this, there is reason to hold out hope that the game may be one to remember once it’s finally ready to launch.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Scott Duwe
Scott Duwe
Senior Staff Writer
Senior Staff Writer & Call of Duty lead. Professional writer for over 10 years. Lover of all things Marvel, Destiny 2, Metal Gear, Final Fantasy, Resident Evil, and more. Previous bylines include PC Gamer, Red Bull Esports, Fanbyte, and Esports Nation. DogDad to corgis Yogi and Mickey, sports fan (NY Yankees, NY Jets, NY Rangers, NY Knicks), Paramore fanatic, cardio enthusiast.