Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Ikoria Lair of Behemoth Magic The Gathering
Image via WotC Magic: The Gathering

Froehlich responds to Rosewater’s innovation or balance question as debate over Companions in MTG rages on

Balance teams keep innovation teams in line, as both are a priority.
This article is over 4 years old and may contain outdated information

A debate over who’s responsible for Companions in Magic: The Gathering yesterday sheds light on the difference between creative design and the play design team.

Recommended Videos

Head of design for Magic, Mark Rosewater, asked the community on Twitter yesterday whether innovation or balance should be an R&D priority at Wizards of the Coast. The question was initially asked due to the number of complaints from Pros and casual players in the MTG community regarding Companions. And an initial response from two-time WSOP bracelet-winner and Magic Pro player, Eric Froehlich, became a focus of the conversation that led to an open note to Rosewater and multiple WotC teams on Twitter. 

https://twitter.com/efropoker/status/1258598972546936833

Froehlich initially responded to Rosewater earlier in the day saying that balance and innovation were on different axes. Many players are calling Companions a mistake due to the cards creating an opportunity for eight cards in an opening hand, which has disrupted the Standard Constructed meta and other Magic formats like Legacy, as well.

Rosewater responded to Froehlich, and many others, essentially taking the blame for Companions because he’s the “innovation guy.” But as Froehlich hammers home in his open note, the creative team is supposed to push boundaries through creativity while the play design team should either power down those ideas or scrap them altogether.

“My personal belief is that telling Mark to stop sharing those ideas or pushing for innovation would mean the end of Magic as we know it,” says Froehlich. “Not pushing the boundaries of creativity is likely to lead to a very boring game that never has the super cool new designs we’ve come to know.”

It’s unlikely that the inner-workings of WotC will get revealed to the public anytime soon, but Froehlich does bring up a solid point. When disruptive cards become the “norm” in Standard and other various Magic formats; either a team needs to be able to say “no” to those ideas, or feel free to rework them without restraints for the better good of the game.

“But if someone(s) down the line is not able to stop and say ‘Oko is too powerful'” Froelich said, “or ‘Companions completely break the fundamentals of Magic as we know them by creating a huge power incentive and a repetitive play experience that a ton of players will actively despise’, then what’s to be done?”

Innovation and balance are both a priority, but balance through extensive playtesting and a dedicated team keeps innovation in check. 


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Danny Forster
Danny Forster
Staff writer, lead beat writer for MTG and TFT
Danny has been writing for Dot Esports for over five years, first as a freelancer and now as a staff writer. He is the lead beat writer for Magic: The Gathering and Teamfight Tactics. Danny is also a solid Monopoly GO player, having beaten every main event without spending a dime. When Danny isn't writing or gaming, he's chilling by the water in Spacecoast Florida with his family and friends. He's always got a tan, because touching grass is important, and loves playing strategic digital and tabletop games. Past outlets Danny has written for include TheGamer and ScreenRant.