Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Sam Coe and the Freestar Rangers pictured having a discussion in the Rock in Aklia City in Starfield.
Screenshot by Dot Esports

Starfield players debate where game ranks among Bethesda’s full catalog

Starfield is reminiscent of other Bethesda titles, but is it better?

Starfield has been out for a little over five weeks now, and the game’s most dedicated players have more than enough time under their belts to determine their opinion of it. In a thread posted to the Starfield subreddit earlier on Oct. 8, players debated where it ranks among the entirety of Bethesda’s catalog of games, with a majority of players coming to the consensus that although the game is solid, it still has some kinks to work out before it can be considered a top three Bethesda title. 

Recommended Videos

Throughout the Reddit thread, most players across the board ranked Starfield just inside Bethesda’s top five, with the most popular choices that outranked it being three Elder Scrolls entries: Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim. Other fans who preferred the Fallout series consistently ranked Fallout 4 above Starfield

One player in the comments said that Starfield is not a top three Bethesda game “in its current state” and that even with some “healthy updates,” it still wouldn’t crack that threshold. “Not every game needs to be the best ever,” they said. 

Bethesda’s fans are usually stalwart in their loyalty to the studio, particularly because of how many of their games follow a similar formula to their predecessors. The engine, progression system, and gameplay loop of a game like Starfield are eerily similar to Bethesda classics like Fallout 3 and Skyrim

In my experience particularly, I found the campaign to echo many of Skyrim’s progression choices, particularly in regard to the pacing during the midsection of the game. Discovering your Starborn powers a third of the way through Starfield was reminiscent of discovering your ability to shout a third of the way through Skyrim, and that’s only the tip of the iceberg between those two games’ comparisons. I also found that the choice to include four set-in-stone side factions with their own individual quest chains in Starfield (Freestar Rangers, Crimson Fleet, Ryujin Inudstries, UC Vanguard) heavily mirrored Skyrim’s choice to do the exact same thing with the Companions, Thieves’ Guild, Dark Brotherhood, and College of Winterhold. 

By no means is Starfield a bad game—in fact, if you’re a fan of the Bethesda game model, you’ll probably end up enjoying it if you haven’t played it already. Although some players on Reddit lambasted Starfield for its “terrible design choices,” like its over-reliance on fast travel, arguably repetitive skill progression system, and heavy over-usage of loading screens, it’s ultimately up to you to decide if those things impede your Starfield experience. 


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Michael Kelly
Michael Kelly
Staff Writer covering World of Warcraft and League of Legends, among others. Mike's been with Dot since 2020, and has been covering esports since 2018.