Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Bluehole, Inc.

PUBG’s executive producer has clarified his comments about Epic Games and Fortnite

"It's not about the idea itself, it's about Epic Games."
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

On Friday, PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds developer Bluehole put out a statement that the team was not happy with Epic Games and the new battle royale mode for its game, Fortnite.

Recommended Videos

Bluehole VP and executive producer C.H. Kim reached out to PC Gamer to clarify his statements, as he claims the message he was trying to convey in the original release was not clear enough.

“So the first thing that I’d like to clarify is that this is not about the battle royale game mode itself,” Kim said. “There were other BR game modes earlier this year that were released, like last man standing or GTA 5’s battle royale game mode, and we never raised an issue, and I think it’s great that there’s more competition and everyone should be able to create their own battle royale game mode, and it’s not about the idea itself, it’s about Epic Games, and that wasn’t really clear [in the press release].”

In both the trailer and official blog post announcing Fortnite: Battle Royale, Epic mentioned PUBG specifically by name. It seems that this is the main sticking point in Bluehole’s gripe with Epic, and not the fact that they made a similar game mode.

“So, we just want to emphasize this is only a problem because Epic Games is the company that makes the engine we use and we pay a large amount of royalties to them,” Kim said. “And we had this business relationship and we had trust that we would be getting continued support, and we were looking forward to working more closely with them to get technical support, maybe develop new features. But our name was used to officially promote their game without our knowledge. There was no discussion. It was just a bit surprising and disappointing to see our business partner using our name officially to promote the game mode that is pretty similar to us and there was misunderstanding in the community that we’re officially involved in the project.”

It’s an odd situation, but it seems as though Bluehole jumped the gun on their original statement and Kim was trying to clear the air to reissue the same statement but with a different tone.

“What I think is, they should have at least came to us before making it and had a discussion with us,” Kim said.

PUBG has had massive success in its early access period, breaking Steam’s record for concurrent player count, as well as selling 10 million copies in just about five months.

Meanwhile, Fortnite: Battle Royale will be free for everyone starting on Sept. 26.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Scott Duwe
Scott Duwe
Senior Staff Writer & Call of Duty lead. Professional writer for over 10 years. Lover of all things Marvel, Destiny 2, Metal Gear, Final Fantasy, Resident Evil, and more. Previous bylines include PC Gamer, Red Bull Esports, Fanbyte, and Esports Nation. DogDad to corgis Yogi and Mickey, sports fan (NY Yankees, NY Jets, NY Rangers, NY Knicks), Paramore fanatic, cardio enthusiast.
twitter