Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Phoenix1 vs Echo Fox | Photo via Riot Games

Riot explains: What is poaching?

The game developer attempted to clarify its poaching rules, but did it just muddle the waters?
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

Poaching in professional League of Legends is a tired subject.

Recommended Videos

Every year, poaching accusations are thrown around as players move from team to team. Sometimes, they appear to be real grievances. Other times, the teams may be look for leverage in trying to get the player that they want. Overall, the mystery behind Riot’s poaching rule and how it’s enforced causes confusion for players, owners, and fans alike. The controversy between Echo Fox and Phoenix1 around support player Adrian Ma is only the latest example.

Today, Riot released a document clarifying what constitutes poaching under its guidelines. All player contracts must be submitted to Riot for approval. When approved, Riot adds the contract to the publicly available contract database. Only contracts added to the database will be protected by Riot’s poaching rules. In this scenario, because Adrian’s contract had not been approved and added to the database when Echo Fox made their offer, their solicitation did not constitute poaching.

What the release doesn’t explain are the mechanics of how the contracts interact with the database. Riot has yet to clarify the timing of its contract review period and what happens in the interim period while the contract is signed, but still under review. Also key is a facet is a cutoff date/time for inclusion in the database, something present in contract mechanics of most other sports leagues. These may seem like minor points, but for legal contracts, things like effective date and effective status are major components. Riot stepping into this process threatens further confusion.

Clarifying poaching is just the first step to improving the current contract environment. Many players are still signing contracts without proper legal representation. And a lack of collective bargaining may benefit the position of teams and Riot itself, but is at odds with the typical operating structure in Western professional sports. Riot, team owners, and players have a lot of work to do to build a stable and sustainable foundation for League esports.

Riot did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Xing Li
Xing Li
Xing has been covering League of Legends esports since 2015. He loves when teams successfully bait Baron, hates tank metas, and is always down for creative support picks—AP Malphite, anybody?
twitter