Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Twitch logo on white background at a 2018 PAX West
Photo via Gage Skidmore | CC BY-SA 2.0

New US laws on view-botting will have some streamers firing up LinkedIn for the first time

I bot the law, and the law won.

You’ve probably mumbled “there’s no way this streamer has 20,000 viewers” to yourself at some point. And now, we might find out soon enough if that’s true thanks to new regulations unveiled by the Federal Trade Commission today.

Recommended Videos

The FTC has published a “final” ruling on purchasing AI comments and reviews for products, strictly prohibiting the practice in the U.S. While most of the rules target reviews and testimonials for products, there’s also an interesting addition about social media indicators: “The final rule prohibits anyone from selling or buying fake indicators of social media influence, such as followers or views generated by a bot or hijacked account.”

A photo of the main booths at TwitchCon Las Vegas 2023.
Stream business is big business. Photo via Twitch on X/Twitter

That definitely seems to implicate stream viewership numbers as companies and esports organizations often tout their overall viewership numbers to media companies and prospective investors alike. If correct, it could mean any U.S. based streamers who are view-botting will need to clean up their act quickly.

Just today, a press release and blog posted by Stream Hatchet touted FaZe Clan’s viewership numbers, showing how that metric is clearly still valued in the content creation business. View-botting, or purchasing a service to send bot accounts to inflate viewership numbers, intentionally obscures real viewership counts and can enable streamers and orgs that buy said bots to artificially inflate their reach on platforms like Twitch, YouTube, and Kick.

View-botting has been a controversial practice for quite a while now, with accusations of botting often lobbed at popular streamers who seem fishy, or from one aggrieved streamer to another content creator in the midst of arguments.

Streamers who are botting often have large viewer counts but little to no activity in their chat, as well as strange underlying performance metrics such as not gaining or even losing followers while sitting near the top of a game category on a given platform. If a person has thousands of real people watching their stream, they almost definitely should have an active chat, and no following or subscription activity is simply bizarre. Either they’ve created the strangest streaming community in existence or they might actually be botting.

So if you notice any streamer’s viewership counts take a sudden and drastic dip in the coming months, it might be some food for thought on the validity of those viewers. And all it took was the government possibly making it illegal.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Adam Snavely
Adam Snavely
Associate Editor
Associate Editor and Apex Legends Lead. From getting into fights over Madden and FIFA with his brothers to interviewing some of the best esports figures in the world, Adam has always been drawn to games with a competitive nature. You'll usually find him on Apex Legends (World's Edge is the best map, no he's not arguing with you about it), but he also dabbles in VALORANT, Super Smash Bros. Melee, CS:GO, Pokemon, and more. Ping an R-301.