Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
NiP CS player ReZ competing on stage.
Photo by Helena Kristiansson via ESL Gaming

NiP lost at the IEM Rio CS:GO Major, but they led all teams in a key strategic statistic

Have you heard of the term Coach Timeout Conversion during the Brazilian Major?

Ninjas in Pyjamas’ current CS:GO project will be evaluated after they finished 0-3 in IEM Rio Major Legends Stage alongside FaZe Clan, but the team at least topped one uncommon leaderboard.

Recommended Videos

Casters Chad “SPUNJ” Burchill and Alex “Machine” Richardson came up with a new statistic during the Brazilian Major that no one seemed to pay attention to before. They started tracking Coach Timeout Conversion (CTC) during the matches to observe whether a coach is having the desired impact during tactical timeouts.

With the help of esports referee Michal Slowinski and software development manager Steve Dudenhoeffer, SPUNJ released a table today with all the timeout conversion rates at the IEM Rio Major thus far. And, surprisingly enough, NiP were at the top at 57.14 percent CTC, followed by Outsiders (56.67 percent) and Team Spirit (54.55 percent).

NiP’s head coach Daniel “djL” Narancic talked with his players in 14 timeouts and they won eight rounds after that while losing six. They lost to Fnatic, Outsiders, and Sprout during the IEM Rio Major and were sent home without taking a single map.

Evil Geniuses (12.50 percent), Team Liquid (16.67 percent), and 9z (18.18 percent) were the teams with the lowest timeout conversion rates at the IEM Rio Major thus far. Liquid have time to improve in that regard since they’re still alive in the competition and could make it into the playoffs.

Of course, this is not the only way to measure whether or not a coach is doing a good job—especially with this sample size. It’s curious nonetheless, though, to see what teams are making the most of their tactical timeouts during one of the most important CS:GO tournaments of the year.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Leonardo Biazzi
Leonardo Biazzi
Staff writer and CS:GO lead. Leonardo has been passionate about games since he was a kid and graduated in Journalism in 2018. Before Leonardo joined Dot Esports in 2019, he worked for Brazilian outlet Globo Esporte. Leonardo also worked for HLTV.org between 2020 and 2021 as a senior writer, until he returned to Dot Esports and became part of the staff team.