Image Credit: Bethesda
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Nintendo and Activision

So, how will Call of Duty actually run on Nintendo Switch?

Apex and Fortnite could give us the answers.

The first thing that springs to mind when Microsoft declared it would be bringing Call of Duty to Nintendo devices after their acquisition of Activision-Blizzard (pending approval), by locking in a 10-year deal (also still, at this time, pending approval) is how well would actually it run on Nintendo Switch platforms?

Recommended Videos

In all honesty, it’s a valid question—and one fans are torn over.

The Switch’s hardware doesn’t come close to matching the minimum specifications required to run Warzone on PC.

It needs a GPU comparable to a GeForce GTX 670, a CPU similar to an Intel i3 Processor or AMD FX-6300 Processor, 8GB of RAM, and 175GB of disk space.

It’s about twice as powerful as the Switch’s custom Maxwell GPU, ARM-based CPU, and 4GB of DD4 SDRAM. Moreover, the base model has 32GB of disk space, while the OLED model has 64GB of disk space, which means an SD card will probably be necessary.

a nintendoswitch with it's dockand joy cons
Image via Nintendo

Despite these technical limitations, the Switch can handle other popular battle royale and competitive shooter titles like Apex Legends and Fortnite, so it has the means to do it.

But if we use them as an example, it also means that while CoD will be playable, it won’t run amazingly, and it certainly won’t look top-notch, at least, not compared to the title running on PC, PS5, and Xbox.

Apex is supposed to run at 30 frames per second on the Switch, but it fails to hit it consistently. The dynamic resolution can also drop as low as 1066×600 in docked mode and 960×540 in handheld mode—and that’s on a port that already has a lot of graphics features toned down.

Fortnite, on the other hand, runs decently. It hovers around 30 frames per second most of the time. It also looks a bit nicer, with a resolution of 1560×880 in docked mode and 1170×660 in handheld mode.

The graphics and draw distance are limited compared to other versions too.

CoD will probably run similarly to Apex and Fortnite, although it’ll likely be closer to Apex because the two are graphically similar, while Fortnite’s cartoony aesthetic makes it less intensive and hardware dependent.

That being said, the Switch has proven that it can punch above its weight on other ports.

DOOM Eternal and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, for example, both run exceptionally well and look fantastic. But since neither has massive sprawling maps filled with players online, it’ll be a stretch for CoD to compare.

Ultimately, it all comes down to how well Microsoft—or whichever studio they employ, can port the CoD titles.

It’ll run but won’t run fantastically unless the port is totally perfect.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Alex Tsiaoussidis
Alex Tsiaoussidis
Staff Writer for Dot Esports. I am a passionate gamer with years of experience covering all things gaming, esports, and streaming. I have extra love for Dota 2, Pokémon, and Apex Legends.
twitter