Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Niantic

Pokémon Go players call on Niantic to make changes to ‘anti-Pokémon’ trading

They're calling on Niantic to change it.

Pokémon Go players believe the trading system, which requires trainers to be in close proximity with each other rather than allowing them to trade over long distances like in the core series, is “anti-Pokémon.” In their view, the restriction goes against one of the most important philosophies of the franchise.

Recommended Videos

“Let me trade with my long-distance buddies,” said one Pokémon player via a Reddit thread posted on May 9, sparking a community-wide discussion on the topic.

That conversation starter was accompanied by a meme highlighting how having the Lucky Bonus applied to a long-distance friend is meaningless since it’s impossible to trade without meeting up. Others echoed the sentiment, saying trading should be possible without needing to be nearby—like in the core series. They could still have bonuses applied to in-person trading to encourage players to meet up, but there’s no reason why they shouldn’t be allowed to trade over long distances.

This prompted one player to say that trading in Pokémon Go is and has always felt “too anti-Pokémon.” Hundreds of others agreed. They even claimed other aspects about it fit the bill too, like not being able to trade any Pokémon more than once, which makes it hard to retain Pokémon that evolve from trades.

The reason for this is trading causes Pokémon IVs to randomize. If Niantic allowed players to trade repeatedly, they could keep trading until their critters had the perfect stats. A solution could be to allow players to trade a specific Pokémon once per day, but if they caught and traded a large quantity, they could still trade them until they got one with perfect stats.

Either way, some players insisted they’d be happy to sacrifice the IV randomization element of trading if it made for a better trading system.

In the end, they concluded Niantic won’t change a thing because it won’t benefit the company. The community seems convinced Niantic isn’t in their corner, especially not as of late. Niantic’s decision to go ahead with the controversial Remote Raid Pass changes despite widespread backlash from players was the biggest indicator of that, and the cut runs deep.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Alex Tsiaoussidis
Alex Tsiaoussidis
Staff Writer for Dot Esports. I am a passionate gamer with years of experience covering all things gaming, esports, and streaming. I have extra love for Dota 2, Pokémon, and Apex Legends.