Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Pexels

Is a bishop better than a knight in chess?

As a diplomat would say, it depends.

Though both the bishop and the knight are technically worth three pawns (or points), they have very different strengths and weaknesses in chess, which means their power levels are radically different depending on what’s going on on the board at any given time.

Recommended Videos

A good understanding of when a bishop is better than a knight and vice versa marks a great step forward for every chess player. Here are the key things to keep in mind when evaluating whether you should keep the horse over the pope.

What is a bishop and a knight worth in chess?

The bishop is worth three points in chess. The pawn is the baseline piece, worth one point. The rook and the queen are more valuable than a bishop (five and nine points, respectively), and it is easy to see why: a single bishop can only access half of the squares on the board, while both of the heavy-hitting pieces simply have more mobility.

But a knight is also worth three points, despite having very different properties. Its unique, L-shaped jumps allow it to pull off maneuvers no other piece is capable of on the board, and it is by far the best piece to pull off nasty tactical strikes. Knight forks, for example, can be especially difficult to spot on lower levels of play.

When is the knight worth more than the bishop in chess?

So where does this leave us? Technically, a knight and a bishop are worth the same, and this is a good rule of thumb when you’re getting started about their relative strengths. You don’t want to give up a rook for either a knight or a bishop under normal circumstances, but you’re happy to give it up for both.

But all chess pieces have a relative value: their strength based on the specific state of play on the chessboard. This is where the biggest differences between a knight and a bishop come in.

Bishops do better in open positions, where pawns have been traded off and there are a lot of long and open diagonals to exploit. This way, they can cover many squares across the board at the same time and rapidly redevelop from point A to point B. They also do better when their counterpart is still on the board. That way, no squares are off-limits for you.

On the other hand, knights benefit greatly from their unique ability to jump over other pieces in closed positions, where many pawns are on the board, facing each other in a chain. The more the other pieces struggle to move, the more the knight comes alive.

Image via chess.com

Knights also have a unique synergy with queens when attacking, as they cover pretty much every entry option and aggressive approach. Should you drop a knight deep into the enemy position onto a protected square, you’ll have an incredibly powerful piece to work with. Knights are also great in time trouble to trick your opponents and find tactical saves in otherwise losing positions.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Luci Kelemen
Luci Kelemen
Weekend editor at Dot Esports. Telling tales of gaming since 2015. Black-belt time-waster when it comes to strategy games and Counter-Strike. Previously featured on PC Gamer, Fanbyte, and more, Occasional chess tournament attendant and even more occasional winner.