Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo via Turner Sports

Owners speak out on ELEAGUE payment controversy

Some owners claim they thought they were owed more money.
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

Teams have spoken out publicly over a recent report of a payment dispute with some Counter-Strike teams and Turner Sports, the organizers of ELEAGUE.

Recommended Videos

A Slingshot report last night claimed that six members of the Professional Esports Association (PEA), the members who took part in ELEAGUE season one, were locked in a dispute with Turner over the terms of payment for the debut event. The teams claim they believed the contract entitled them to a $30,000 appearance fee on top of a minimum of $30,000 prize money—something Turner reportedly disputes.

In a statement to Dot Esports, a Turner Sports spokesperson said that all teams had been paid. The original report claims that the six PEA teams had not yet received payment.

Today, several team owners spoke publicly the issue for the first time. Victor Goossens of Team Liquid confirmed his belief that the team was owed a $30,000 appearance fee, stating that he believed “most teams” shared that interpretation.

This was disputed however by Flipsid3 Tactics founder Hector Rosario, who said that he understood that the $30,000 figure referred to a minimum prize money payout for a last-place finish.

G2 Esports owner Carlos “Ocelote” Rodriguez Santiago, who are part of the ESL-run WESA team association, tweeted that he had also believed the appearance fee was an extra payment.

Despite the teams claim that they believe they are owed the money, they have so far not made any public suggestion of taking further action over the issue.


Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Callum Leslie
Callum Leslie
Weekend Editor, Dot Esports.